Home  ›  Art Style Where Person in Front of Round Background

Art Style Where Person in Front of Round Background

Written By Wednesday, May 4, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Early-20th-century avant-garde fine art movement

Non to be confused with QBism.

Cubism is an early-20th-century avant-garde art motility that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and compages. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, cleaved upward and reassembled in an abstracted grade—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject field from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[1] Cubism has been considered the most influential art movement of the 20th century.[2] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a wide variety of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or near Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The movement was pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[4] One primary influence that led to Cubism was the representation of three-dimensional form in the late works of Paul Cézanne.[5] A retrospective of Cézanne's paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, electric current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by two commemorative retrospectives after his decease in 1907.[6]

In France, offshoots of Cubism developed, including Orphism, abstruse art and later Purism.[7] [8] The touch of Cubism was far-reaching and wide-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Fine art Deco developed in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings agree in common with Cubism the fusing of the past and the present, the representation of unlike views of the field of study pictured at the same time or successively, also called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[9] while Constructivism was influenced past Picasso'south technique of amalgam sculpture from split elements.[10] Other common threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians have divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the start stage of Cubism, known as Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined by Juan Gris a posteriori,[11] was both radical and influential as a brusque but highly significant art movement between 1910 and 1912 in French republic. A 2d phase, Constructed Cubism, remained vital until effectually 1919, when the Surrealist movement gained popularity. English language art historian Douglas Cooper proposed some other scheme, describing three phases of Cubism in his volume, The Cubist Epoch. According to Cooper there was "Early Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the movement was initially developed in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the second stage being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged every bit an important exponent (after 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Belatedly Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) equally the concluding stage of Cubism every bit a radical avant-garde movement.[12] Douglas Cooper'southward restrictive use of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) unsaid an intentional value judgement.[v]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–ten, Figure dans un Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on canvas, 92.1 × 73 cm, Tate Modern, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso's 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has often been considered a proto-Cubist work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque's exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles chosen Braque a daring man who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[14] [15]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has just sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of picayune cubes".[15] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse's words and spoke of Braque's little cubes. The motif of the viaduct at l'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce iii paintings marked past the simplification of grade and deconstruction of perspective.[16]

Georges Braque's 1908 Houses at Fifty'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes fabricated by Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, as the first Cubist paintings. The offset organized group exhibition past Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room called 'Salle 41'; information technology included works by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, nonetheless no works by Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[five]

By 1911 Picasso was recognized as the inventor of Cubism, while Braque'southward importance and precedence was argued later on, with respect to his handling of space, book and mass in the L'Estaque landscapes. But "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to exist called Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[5]

The assertion that the Cubist depiction of space, mass, time, and volume supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the canvas was made past Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler as early on as 1920,[xviii] only it was bailiwick to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, especially by Cloudless Greenberg.[19]

Contemporary views of Cubism are complex, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were too singled-out from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered simply secondary to them. Alternative interpretations of Cubism have therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were later on associated with the "Salle 41" artists, east.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who outset in tardily 1911 formed the core of the Section d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine besides as Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such as Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (after 1916) and Georges Valmier (after 1918). More than fundamentally, Christopher Green argues that Douglas Cooper's terms were "later undermined past interpretations of the work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[5]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram existence a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram demand not eschew certain aspects of appearance merely these too volition be treated as signs non as imitations or recreations."[20]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, Fifty'Homme au Balcon, Man on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on canvas, 195.vi × 114.9 cm (77 × 45 ane/4 in.), Philadelphia Museum of Fine art. Completed the same year that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Arsenal show, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

There was a distinct divergence between Kahnweiler'southward Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a lesser extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an annual income for the exclusive right to purchase their works. Kahnweiler sold only to a small circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained in that location until later the First World State of war. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[5]

In contrast, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major non-bookish Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more aware of public response and the need to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a grouping began to form which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio almost the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées often included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other immature artists, the group wanted to emphasise a research into class, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist accent on color.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), made a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier as "ignorant geometers, reducing the human body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months afterward, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was later on reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The get-go public controversy generated by Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the spring of 1911. This showing by Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attention of the general public for the showtime fourth dimension. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Tower, Tour Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911. Picasso'southward 1908 Seated Woman (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photo of the artist in his studio (upper left). Metzinger's Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced top correct. Also reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photo of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the aforementioned year, in addition to the Indépendants group of Salle 41, were exhibited works by André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the October 8, 1911 issue of The New York Times. This article was published a yr after Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and two years prior to the Armory Bear witness, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic fine art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times article portrayed works past Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated earlier 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Boss Paris' Fall Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Fine art Exhibition – What Its Followers Attempt to Do. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is alluring so much attention equally the extraordinary productions of the and so-called "Cubist" schoolhouse. In fact, dispatches from Paris suggest that these works are easily the main feature of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is fairly respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases earlier which Paris has stood and at present again stands in blank amazement.

What do they mean? Accept those responsible for them taken exit of their senses? Is it art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself acquired a scandal, even amongst the Cubists. It was in fact rejected by the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Section d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Arsenal Show in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and former colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new add-on to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Art Found of Chicago), while Metzinger's ii showings included La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a horse) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Denmark).[30] Delaunay'southward monumental La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger's La Noce, The Wedding (Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris), were also exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the showtime declared group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, 20 April to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works by 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral's association with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the paper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. two was exhibited for the first fourth dimension.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) before, during and afterwards the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau as a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was not always positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [40] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a series of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Fine art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau bear witness: "No dubiety that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the use of government owned buildings, such equally the K Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the political leader Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front page of Le Journal, v Oct 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a debate in the Chambre des Députés about the apply of public funds to provide the venue for such art.[44] The Cubists were defended past the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

It was confronting this background of public anger that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English and Russian in 1913).[47] Among the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier'southward vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked past Bears) now at Rhode Isle Schoolhouse of Design Museum, Joseph Csaky's Deux Femme, Ii Women (a sculpture now lost), in addition to the highly abstract paintings past Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Bound) (Museum of Mod Fine art, New York).

Abstraction and the set up-fabricated [edit]

The most extreme forms of Cubism were non those proficient by Picasso and Braque, who resisted full abstraction. Other Cubists, by contrast, especially František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accepted abstraction by removing visible discipline matter entirely. Kupka's two entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstruse (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 adult an expressive and allusive abstraction defended to complex emotional and sexual themes. Start in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed by a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with bright prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his departure from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–14 Léger produced a series entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and course. His Cubism, despite its abstract qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modern life. Apollinaire supported these early developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the discipline was vacated. But in spite of his use of the term Orphism these works were and so different that they defy attempts to place them in a single category.[five]

Also labeled an Orphist by Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for another extreme development inspired by Cubism. The ready-made arose from a joint consideration that the work itself is considered an object (only as a painting), and that information technology uses the material detritus of the world (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist construction and Assemblage). The adjacent logical footstep, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object as a cocky-sufficient work of art representing only itself. In 1913 he attached a bicycle bike to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a bottle-drying rack equally a sculpture in its own correct.[five]

Section d'Or [edit]

The Section d'Or, also known every bit Groupe de Puteaux, founded by some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a commonage of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Section d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the most important pre-World War I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a wide audience. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The group seems to take adopted the name Department d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism adult in parallel by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to prove that Cubism, rather than being an isolated art-form, represented the continuation of a thou tradition (indeed, the gold ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of diverse interests for at to the lowest degree 2,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Department d'Or originated in the course of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The group's title was suggested past Villon, after reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura past Joséphin Péladan.

During the belatedly 19th and early on 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American fine art. Artists such equally Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired by the stark power and simplicity of styles of those foreign cultures. Around 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a time when both artists had recently acquired an interest in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, perhaps leading to Picasso inbound a new period in his work past 1907, marked past the influence of Greek, Iberian and African art. Picasso's paintings of 1907 have been characterized as Protocubism, every bit notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the ancestor of Cubism.[13]

The fine art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were especially influential to the formation of Cubism and peculiarly important to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is mostly referred to as the offset Cubist picture. This is an exaggeration, for although information technology was a major commencement step towards Cubism it is not yet Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist chemical element in information technology is even contrary to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the world in a discrete, realistic spirit. All the same, the Demoiselles is the logical picture to have as the starting signal for Cubism, because it marks the nativity of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and because all that followed grew out of it."[13]

The nigh serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar caption "fails to requite acceptable consideration to the complexities of a flourishing art that existed just before and during the period when Picasso'due south new painting developed."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a conscious search for a new fashion caused rapid changes in art beyond French republic, Germany, The Netherlands, Italia, and Russia. The Impressionists had used a double betoken of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who besides admired Cézanne) flattened the picture aeroplane, reducing their subjects to simple geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist construction and subject matter, most notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (e.grand., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was another important influence. There were likewise parallels in the development of literature and social thought.[51]

In improver to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to be institute in the two singled-out tendencies of Cézanne'southward afterward work: first his breaking of the painted surface into small multifaceted areas of paint, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given by binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. All the same, the cubists explored this concept farther than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single film airplane, as if the objects had all their faces visible at the same time. This new kind of depiction revolutionized the way objects could be visualized in painting and art.

The historical study of Cubism began in the late 1920s, cartoon at kickoff from sources of limited data, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler's volume Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "synthetic" which afterwards emerged take been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred later the facts they identify. Neither phase was designated as such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our only fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that express definition."[51]

The traditional estimation of "Cubism", formulated post facto every bit a means of understanding the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is difficult to utilize to painters such as Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose cardinal differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to telephone call them Cubists at all. According to Daniel Robbins, "To advise that merely considering these artists developed differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to exist relegated to a secondary or satellite function in Cubism is a profound mistake."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" usually stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connection with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice by the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a similar context. However, the give-and-take "cube" was used in 1906 by another critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference not to Picasso or Braque but rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"M. Metzinger is a mosaicist like M. Signac just he brings more precision to the cutting of his cubes of color which appear to have been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The critical use of the word "cube" goes back at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the piece of work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a large and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. 1 even wonders why the artist has non used cubes of solid affair diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did not come into general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to showroom at the Brussels Indépendants. The following year, in preparation for the Salon de la Department d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an attempt to dispel the confusion raging around the word, and as a major defence of Cubism (which had caused a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims as artists, this work was the get-go theoretical treatise on Cubism and it nonetheless remains the clearest and virtually intelligible. The effect, not solely a collaboration between its two authors, reflected discussions by the circumvolve of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. Information technology mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of information technology were read prior to publication.[5] [51] The concept developed in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject from different points in space and time simultaneously, i.e., the human activity of moving around an object to seize information technology from several successive angles fused into a single image (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a mostly recognized device used past the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" past Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries past Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso outset in 1905, and Braque beginning in 1907, but gave as much attention to artists such equally Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[5]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their work comprehensible to a wide audience (fine art critics, fine art collectors, art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the neat success of the exhibition, Cubism became advanced movement recognized equally a genre or manner in art with a specific mutual philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism between 1914 and 1916 was signaled past a shift towards a strong accent on big overlapping geometric planes and flat surface action. This grouping of styles of painting and sculpture, especially meaning between 1917 and 1920, was good by several artists; peculiarly those under contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of club reflected in these works, led to its being referred to by the critic Maurice Raynal equally 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested by Cubists prior to the commencement of World War I—such equally the fourth dimension, dynamism of modernistic life, the occult, and Henri Bergson'due south concept of duration—had now been vacated, replaced by a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à l'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—by those who served the armed forces and past those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Cracking State of war, both during and directly following the conflict. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French society and French culture.[5]

Cubism after 1918 [edit]

The virtually innovative period of Cubism was before 1914[ citation needed ]. After World War I, with the support given by the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a central issue for artists, and continued as such until the mid-1920s when its avant-garde status was rendered questionable past the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, even well after 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In French republic, however, Cubism experienced a decline offset in about 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not but the artists stranded by Kahnweiler'south exile but others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de 50'Try Moderne in Paris. Attempts were fabricated by Louis Vauxcelles to contend that Cubism was dead, but these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist testify at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the aforementioned twelvemonth, demonstrated it was withal alive.[5]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the advent from near 1917–24 of a coherent body of theoretical writing past Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, among the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative piece of work either exclusively or alongside Cubist work—experienced by many artists during this period (chosen Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural dominance of a classical or Latin image of France during and immediately following the war. Cubism after 1918 can be seen as part of a wide ideological shift towards conservatism in both French society and civilization. Yet, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of individual artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and across the work of artists every bit different from each other as Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism as a publicly debated motion became relatively unified and open up to definition. Its theoretical purity made it a gauge against which such diverse tendencies as Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could be compared.[v]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Nippon and People's republic of china were among the first countries in Asia to exist influenced by Cubism. Contact first occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for case those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought back with them both an understanding of modern fine art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu's Self Portrait with Red Optics (1912) and Fang Ganmin's Melody in Autumn (1934).[59] [60]

Estimation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more than a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their work. "It is past no means articulate, in any case," wrote Christopher Green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their evolution of such techniques equally faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well have arrived at such practices with lilliputian cognition of 'true' Cubism in its early stages, guided above all by their ain agreement of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended beyond the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, yet-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-scale modern-life subjects. Aimed at a big public, these works stressed the use of multiple perspective and circuitous planar faceting for expressive outcome while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[5]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of time to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'elapsing' proposed by the philosopher Henri Bergson according to which life is subjectively experienced as a continuum, with the by flowing into the nowadays and the present merging into the futurity. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and space and effects of multiple viewpoints to convey a concrete and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions between past, present and hereafter. I of the major theoretical innovations made by the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] cartoon to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of separate spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective adult during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject thing was no longer considered from a specific signal of view at a moment in fourth dimension, simply built post-obit a selection of successive viewpoints, i.due east., as if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the heart complimentary to roam from one to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a high caste of complexity in Metzinger's Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Department d'Or; Le Fauconnier'south Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay's Metropolis of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These aggressive works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger'south The Nuptials, also shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave form to the notion of simultaneity by presenting unlike motifs every bit occurring inside a single temporal frame, where responses to the past and present interpenetrate with collective force. The conjunction of such subject thing with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings by Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves made in response to early Cubism.[9]

Cubism and modern European art was introduced into the United States at the now legendary 1913 Armory Show in New York Metropolis, which so traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory show Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Head of a Woman (Fernande) (1909–10), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited seven important and big drypoints, while his blood brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and L'Homme au balcon (1912), two highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko too contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the same bronze cast, xl.v × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

Just as in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne's reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And just as in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture adult in parallel to Cubist painting. During the autumn of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Adult female (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative infinite and vice versa. According to Douglas Cooper: "The first true Cubist sculpture was Picasso'southward impressive Woman'south Head, modeled in 1909–10, a counterpart in 3 dimensions to many similar belittling and faceted heads in his paintings at the time."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited by Alexander Archipenko in 1912–xiii, for example in Adult female Walking.[5] Joseph Csaky, after Archipenko, was the first sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and and then in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist structure was as influential equally any pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus backside the proto-Constructivist work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-point for the entire constructive tendency in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[5]

Architecture [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly edifice, Chandigarh, India

Cubism formed an important link between early-20th-century fine art and compages.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early ramifications in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though there are many points of intersection between Cubism and architecture, only a few direct links between them tin be fatigued. Most often the connections are fabricated by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of form, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional form, using unproblematic geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Diverse elements could exist superimposed, fabricated transparent or penetrate one another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had become an influential gene in the evolution of modernistic architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of building blueprint, the utilize of materials appropriate to industrial product, and the increased employ of glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a manner that needed not refer to the by. Thus, what had become a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied as function of "a profound reorientation towards a changed globe".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in avant-garde architecture. The influential De Stijl movement embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism developed by Piet Mondrian under the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was too linked past Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. However, the linking of bones geometric forms with inherent beauty and ease of industrial application—which had been prefigured past Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (better known every bit Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier'south ambition had been to translate the properties of his ain fashion of Cubism to architecture. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier full-bodied his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies soon advanced into many different architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist Firm). Image published in Les Peintres Cubistes, by Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Bourgeois, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger's Femme à fifty'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known as Maison Cubiste (Cubist Business firm), with compages past Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior decoration by André Mare forth with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the aggregation of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote nigh the autonomous nature of art, stressing the betoken that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative piece of work, to them, was the "antithesis of the picture". "The true film" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. Information technology tin can exist moved from a church to a drawing-room, from a museum to a study. Essentially independent, necessarily complete, it need not immediately satisfy the mind: on the reverse, information technology should lead information technology, little by picayune, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative calorie-free resides. Information technology does non harmonize with this or that ensemble; it harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: information technology is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model business firm, with a facade, a staircase, wrought atomic number 26 banisters, and two rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings past Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Woman with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a bedchamber. Information technology was an example of L'art décoratif, a home within which Cubist art could be displayed in the comfort and manner of modern, conservative life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed by Duchamp-Villon, to the 2 furnished rooms.[seventy] This architectural installation was subsequently exhibited at the 1913 Armory Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York showroom as Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet'due south hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed past André Mare, and were early examples of the influence of cubism on what would go Art Deco. They were composed of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare called the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Bourgeois. Léger described this proper name every bit 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely excellent for us, really splendid. People will run into Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[2]

"Mare'south ensembles were accepted equally frames for Cubist works because they allowed paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement non but of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, but of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare'due south quondam friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the ornamentation of a Studio House, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and endemic by the French fashion designer Jacques Doucet, likewise a collector of Post-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought directly from Picasso'southward studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz made the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist rug.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist architecture [edit]

The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was practical to compages only in Bohemia (today Czechia) and particularly in its capital letter, Prague.[79] [80] Czech architects were the first and but ones to ever blueprint original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the nearly part between 1910 and 1914, just the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were likewise built after World State of war I. Subsequently the state of war, the architectural style chosen Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist architecture with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and calm contained in it, through a creative thought, so that the result would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved by shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, by arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-similar units, reminiscent of the so-called diamond cut, or fifty-fifty cavernous that are reminiscent of the late Gothic architecture. In this way, the entire surfaces of the facades including fifty-fifty the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles as well as other architectural ornaments attain a three-dimensional class. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were also created, east. one thousand. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects as well designed Cubist piece of furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked mostly in Prague simply besides in other Bohemian towns. The best-known Cubist building is the House of the Black Madonna in the Old Boondocks of Prague built in 1912 past Josef Gočár with the but Cubist café in the world, Chiliad Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the archway pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has also been preserved well-nigh the Wenceslas Foursquare, designed past Emil Králíček in 1912, who also congenital the Diamond Firm in the New Town of Prague effectually 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, exterior painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein employ repetition and repetitive phrases equally building blocks in both passages and whole capacity. Nearly of Stein's important works utilize this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not only were they the first important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were also important influences on Cubism also. In turn, Picasso was an of import influence on Stein'southward writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner's 1930 novel Every bit I Lay Dying tin exist read equally an interaction with the cubist mode. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of 15 characters which, when taken together, produce a single cohesive trunk.

The poets by and large associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. As American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the conscious, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity fabricated self-sufficient by its rigorous architecture. This is quite different from the free association of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Withal, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the afterward movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our immediate elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though not also remembered as the Cubist painters, these poets go on to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett have recently produced new translations of Reverdy's piece of work. Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is also said to demonstrate how cubism's multiple perspectives can exist translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is nearly impossible to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts every bit not bad as that which took place in the early Renaissance. Its effects on later fine art, on film, and on architecture are already so numerous that we hardly notice them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans un fauteuil (Eva), Adult female in an Armchair, oil on canvas, 149.9 x 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Drove

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on canvas, 142 x 100.iii cm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de Fifty'Accordéon (The Accordion Histrion), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Press articles and reviews [edit]

  • (middle) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Man with Pipe), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano II), (right) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, 13 March 1914

  • Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Blue, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Fine art Gallery; and sculpture past Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, northward. 1529, xiii October 1912

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, L'autobus. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, xiv March 1920

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Man on a Balcony, L'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–13, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (continued), north. 1916, xiv March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Human in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; Baronial Agero, sculpture, Bosom; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Spectacles, or Banjo and Glasses. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, 1 December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, 9 March 1913. Picabia held his first one-homo bear witness in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 fine art gallery (formerly Piddling Galleries of the Photo-Secession), March 17 - April 5, 1913

See also [edit]

  • Fourth dimension in fine art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Section d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Note sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), Oct–Nov 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Green, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-thirteen at the Wayback Motorcar
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Christopher Light-green, MoMA collection Cubism, Origins and application of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009 Archived 2014-06-13 at the Wayback Motorcar
  5. ^ a b c d east f g h i j k l m n o p q r Christopher Light-green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Printing Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Hindsight, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The Academy of Iowa Museum of Fine art, J. Paul Getty Trust, Academy of Washington Press 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Fine art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Car
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Formation, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009 Archived 2008-x-24 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ Laurels, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A Earth History of Art. seventh edn. London: Laurence Male monarch Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Press Limited 1970 in clan with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art ISBN 0-87587-041-4
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, 14 Nov 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Avant-garde Explosion, Centre Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-paper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–ix, 60–61; repr. as 'Collage' in Art and Culture (Boston, 1961), pp. lxx–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on Nov 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March eighteen, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Center of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, The University of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Tower". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on February 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". www.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Faddy in the Current Art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Practise". October 8, 1911. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911 (Loftier-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Fine art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. two Archived 2017-09-eighteen at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Horse, oil on sail, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January 15, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, University of Chicago Press, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Carol A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, Fifty'exposició d'Fine art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of State of war: The Avant-garde and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale University Press, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Machine (Barcelona) 18 Apr 1912, Whatever 22, núm. 4637–4652 (16–30 abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912 (includes numerous articles on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale Academy Printing, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (iii maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Journal". Gallica. October v, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Athenaeum de fifty'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand l'fine art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an account of the debate.
  46. ^ "biography". www.peterbrooke.org.uk. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September 18, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. 5". Archived from the original on March xiv, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, nine Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on April 3, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, 20–27
  51. ^ a b c d e f grand Robbins, Daniel (April 19, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Internet Archive.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac's influence, referring to Metzinger'southward "precision in the cutting of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de French republic : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. Dec 1, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (April nineteen, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Press. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on January ane, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Mod Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Modern Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.M.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Annal, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Written report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Establish of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–ten, Head of a Woman, bronze, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, Blue Mountain Project, Princeton University
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Art History ii (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (Apr 19, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture. American Philosophical Order. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Architecture and cubism. Eye canadien d'architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture : MIT Printing. April 19, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open up WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Collection | MoMA". The Museum of Modern Art. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Blueprint in the Start Car Historic period (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. 10–11. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-vii
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 2, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Arsenal Prove Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ "Detail of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Show records, 1859-1984, bulk 1900-1949". world wide web.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern art: at the Armory of the Sixty-9th Infantry". Clan of American Painters and Sculptors. Apr 19, 1913 – via Net Archive.
  74. ^ Green, Christopher (January 1, 2000). Art in France, 1900-1940. Yale Academy Printing. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on Nov thirty, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky's staircase in the domicile of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved xviii December 2012.
  76. ^ Rex, Aestheticus (14 April 2011). "Jacques Doucet's Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in France, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Printing. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on thirty April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. 5. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on xxx Apr 2016. Retrieved eighteen December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. 9. ISBN978-80-7281-469-5.
  80. ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist architecture". www.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved ane September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on eight October 2015. Retrieved i September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Poetry of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Title Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-eleven .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-iv.

Further reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Art, New York: Museum of Modern Fine art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Bear on of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-iv-four.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in association with the Los Angeles Canton Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN0-87587-041-iv.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Assay, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Rebel 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-1
  • Marker Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The Academy of Chicago Press, 2008
  • Christopher Dark-green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–28, Yale University Press, New Oasis and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Pop-Art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian past Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Art Periodical, Vol. 41, No. 4, (Winter 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Section d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'fine art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Architecture in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du One thousand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
  • Alphabetize of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Enquiry Center for Modern Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Style: Mainstreaming Modernism after the Arsenal, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. ane (Spring 2014), pp. one–28. doi:10.1086/675687

adamsmagning00.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism

0 Response to "Art Style Where Person in Front of Round Background"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel